December 6, 2006
Readings for the law school innovator?
I want to start assembling a reading list for would-be law school innovators. Such a list should, of course,include lots of classics and modern pieces. While readers perhaps use the comments to suggest classics, here is a modern piece by Carol Parker. Her article is entitled "Institutional Repositories and the Principle of Open Access: Changing the Way We Think About Legal Scholarship" and is available here at SSRN. Here is part of the abstract:
Open access to scholarship, that is, making scholarship freely available to the public via self-archiving in online institutional repositories (IR's), is a natural fit for legal scholarship given our tradition of making legal information available to citizens. Legal scholars have enjoyed the benefits of open access to working paper repositories such as SSRN for more than ten years — even if they have not thought of this practice as "open access." It is a natural progression for legal scholars to now self-archive published articles as well, and they are beginning to do so as awareness grows of the benefits of providing open access to legal scholarship. IR's generate new audiences for legal scholarship and the publicity and download counts generated by repositories provide new ways to measure scholarly impact and reputation. IR's can be used to publish student scholarship, empirical data, teaching materials, and original historical documents uncovered during the research process. IR's also preserve digital work. Approximately 40% of U.S. law schools now have some form of institutional repository.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Readings for the law school innovator?:
The comments to this entry are closed.