« Another New Legal Education Reform Blog | Main | Washington and Lee and the New Third Year »

March 11, 2008

Are study groups cheating?

Shockwaves are blowing through the blogosphere over Ryerson University's effort to expulse a student who set up a Facebook study group for his first-year chemistry course. Without specific details as to what the students were sharing and the nature and expectations of how they would do their homework, it's hard to know how close to the line these students were to "cheating." On the one hand, a study group with 147 members looks, on the surface, more like a smuggling ring than a discussion group. On the other, today's online social networks enable large groups of people to affiliate loosely and collaborate on micro projects.

Were the students in this matter engaged in old-fashioned cheating, or is the professor a clueless digital refusnik? Study groups are a mainstay of the law school experience, as are outlines passed down through generations of 1Ls. And law students, as I've argued before, generally need more opportunities to work together. Plus, few classes have homework anyway.

Nonetheless, I'm curious: do you, or your school, have a policy about online study groups and sharing of notes? For example, what's your take on SwapNotes, which also happens to have a Facebook incarnation?

Gene Koo

March 11, 2008 in Serving students | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c8ccf53ef00e550ec50ad8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Are study groups cheating?:

Comments

There have always been study groups. Now it manifests differently in the digital age. Personally, would make more sense, and be more fair, to actually establish wrongdoing before doing something drastic.

PIWorkshop.com, presented by an expert with an extensive background in law enforcement and PI work, teaches how to get a private investigators license and become a good private detective.

Posted by: piworkshop | May 23, 2008 2:23:41 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.