« Who will get the first e-book into the law school classroom? | Main | Fashion and Court »

May 14, 2009

Rankings and Drinking

Over at Paul Caron's blog, I noticed his analysis of the Law School Party Rankings (in which Arizona State is #1, somehow edging out Tulane).   Tulane's Alan Childress, in turn, ignores this anomoly and makes a fascinating observation:  Sloppy as this ranking may have been, isn't there some validity in polling the consumers of our product in creating a ranking of schools?  Certainly, I wish the questions in such a survey weren't about beer availability (especially since I work at Baylor), but there is the grain of an excellent idea there-- to measure consumer satisfaction in creating rankings.  To be fair, I think it would be best to measure that satisfaction both among current students and alums, since we do not realize the full value of our education until we are using it in the market.

As Childress points out, the U.S. News method of polling deans and hiring chairs at the law schools which are being ranked is too often like letting the Pepsi executives rank Coke-- there is little chance of objectivity there.

It is a sad commentary to say that simply considering the satisfaction of our customers would be innovative, but I think that at too many schools that would be a fair characterization.

-- Mark Osler

May 14, 2009 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c8ccf53ef01156f91b022970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rankings and Drinking:

Comments

Money is the sincerest form of valuation between strangers.

The schools should be ranked by the incomes of their alumni, stratified by years out of school. An applicant is unlikely to do much better than the average grad.

If the grad is in government, ask the budget for which he is responsible, as a separate category.

And if a Supreme Court Justice has a lower wage than a hack DUI specialist, that is correct. The Justices are lazy, worthless government workers.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 14, 2009 7:24:03 PM

Good point, Mark. Princeton Review does these surveys, though it would be nice if they guaranteed a minimum participation rate, as does the Law School Survey of Student Engagement.

Posted by: Jason Solomon | May 18, 2009 3:13:38 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.