« Results of Friday afternoon's survey.... | Main | Mid-term results available for downloading »
November 3, 2014
Sexual offense code reform proposals from our drafting subcommittees
At the risk of losing something in translation or formatting (indeed, I fear some of the numbering is messed up), I am going to post here, in the order for in-class presentation, the subcommittee proposals for revising/reforming Oliwood's rape provisions and for a campus sex cod. (I urge everyone to put any needed corrections/clarifications/concerns in the comments AND I suggest each group consider bringing hard-copy versions of their proposals to our legislative session this afternoon to aid full committee review and consideration.)
First Oliwood Rape Reform Drafting Subcommittee (FORR)
ARTICLE 213. AGGRAVATED RAPE AND RAPE
Section 213.0. Definitions. In this Article, unless a different meaning plainly is required:
(1) the definitions given in Section 210.0 apply;
(2) "Sexual contact" includes the penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person.
(3) “Consent” means that at the time of the act of sexual contact there are actual words or conduct indicating freely given agreement to have sexual contact.
(4) A person is deemed incapable of consent when he or she is: (i) unconscious; or (ii) asleep; or
(iii) mentally disabled; or (iv) mentally handicapped; or (v) less than than 15 years old
Section 213.1 Aggravated Rape: A person who commits rape while any of the following circumstances are present is guilty of aggravated rape:
(a) if it is committed by using force or threat of death, serious bodily injury, extreme pain or kidnapping, to be inflicted on anyone is caused; or
(b) if death, serious bodily injury, extreme pain or kidnapping is caused to anyone; or
(c) the offender purposefully or knowingly acted without the person’s consent; or
(d) the offender purposefully or knowingly acted without the person’s consent and (i) the offender has substantially impaired the person’s power to appraise or control the person’s conduct by administering or employing, without the person’s knowledge, drugs, intoxicants or other means for the purpose of preventing resistance; or (ii) the person is less than 18 years old; or (iii) the offender has previously been convicted of committing a rape or an aggravated rape in any degree
Violations of § 213.1(a) and § 213.1(c) are considered to be aggravated rape in the second degree. Violation of § 213.1(b) and § 213.1(d) are considered to be aggravated rape in the first degree.
Section 213.2 Rape. A person who engages in sexual contact with another person without that person’s consent while any of the following circumstances are present is guilty of rape:
(a) the offender recklessly or negligently acted without the person’s consent
(b)the person was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the essential characteristics of the act due to the offender’s fraudulent representation that the sexual penetration served a professional purpose when it served no professional purpose.
Section 213.3 Provisions Generally Applicable to Article 213.
Mistake as to Age. Whenever in this Article the criminality of conduct depends on a child's being below the age of 15, it is no defense that the actor did not know the child's age, or reasonably believed the child to be older than 15. When criminality depends on the child's being below a critical age other than 15, it is a defense for the actor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he reasonably believed the child to be above the critical age.
Second Oliwood Rape Reform Drafting Subcommittee (SORR)
Section 213.0. Definitions
"Sexual conduct" means vaginal intercourse between a male and female; anal intercourse, or oral between persons; and, without privilege to do so, the insertion, however slight, of any part of the body or any object into the vaginal or anal opening of another. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete vaginal or anal intercourse. [ORC 2907.01]
Section 213.1. Rape and Related Offenses
(1) Rape. A person who engages in sexual conduct with another person is guilty of rape if:
(a) that person compels another to submit by force, by threat that would prevent resistance by any person of ordinary resolution, or by threat of imminent death, serious bodily injury, extreme pain or kidnapping, to be inflicted on anyone; or
(b) the offender has impaired the others ability to appraise or control their conduct by knowingly administering or employing without their knowledge drugs, intoxicants, or other means; or
(c) the person is unconscious, or suffers from a mental disease or defect rendering them incapable of understanding the nature of the conduct; or
(d) the person is less than 14 years old and the offender is more than two years older;
(2) Gross Sexual Imposition. A person is guilty of gross sexual imposition if they:
(a) recklessly engage in sexual conduct with a person who is unaware of the conduct due to intoxication or other means of inhibition not resulting from the offender's conduct; or
(b) knowingly engage in sexual conduct with another by impersonating the victims significant other or spouse; or
(c) purposely engage in sexual conduct with another by deception in regards to contraceptive methods
(d) engage in sexual conduct with another by acting recklessly in regards to their own sexual transmitted diseases
(3) Sentencing
(a) Any person found guilty of (1)(a)-(d) under Section 213.1. is guilty of a felony in the first degree
(b) Any person found guilty of (2)(a)-(b) under Section 213.1. is guilty of a felony in the third degree
(c) Any person found guilty of (2)(c)-(d) under Section 213.1 is guilty of a misdemeanor
First Oliwood Campus Code Drafting Subcommittee (FOCC)
INTRODUCTION
Universities have a fundamental responsibility of educating students. In order to fulfill this responsibility, a safe learning environment must exist, which is threatened by the prevalence of campus sexual offenses. While sexual offenses occur throughout society, there are important distinctions between those that occur on college campuses and those that occur in other contexts.
Currently, campus sexual offenses are very common and very underreported. Studies suggest that college students are an exceptionally vulnerable population. According to data collected from nearly three dozen universities, of students found responsible for sexual assault, only 30% were expelled, 47% were suspended, 17% received educational sanctions, and 13% were placed on probation, sometimes in addition to other punishments. Further, 70% of guilty students are allowed to remain on campus and most are repeat offenders, thus creating a strong concern about incapacitation.
FOCC takes a utilitarian approach to drafting a model campus sexual offense code. Simply put, we have weighed the costs and benefits of imposing a stricter, broader code and trust universities to enforce it responsibly. Educative and retributive theorists may argue that college students are less mature and therefore less culpable, however, we take the position that expulsion, or incapacitation, is necessary for the two worst forms of sexual offenses. That is, universities should be able to eliminate potential threats in order to keep other students safe.
Given the prevalence of sexual violence across college campuses, and recognizing the need for a more effective campus sexual offense policy, the FOCC proposes the following code.
RAPE AND RELATED OFFENSES
(A) Rape: Any individual is guilty of rape if:
(i) They compel the victim to submit by force or threat of imminent death, serious bodily injury, extreme pain or kidnapping, to be inflicted on anyone; or
(ii) They subsequently impair the victim’s power to appraise or control their conduct by administering or employing without their knowledge: drugs, intoxicants, or other means for the purpose of preventing their resistance; or
(iii) The victim is unconscious.
(B) Rape is defined as nonconsensual (i) sexual intercourse; (ii) sexually deviant acts resulting in the penetration of the victim’s orifices.
Punishment. Any individual found to have violated any subsection of this provision beyond a preponderance of the evidence, upon examination by the FOCC Board, shall be expelled from the University at the discretion of the Board’s consideration of the surrounding circumstances of the case.
SEXUAL ASSAULT
Any person who has non-consensual sexual contact with another, defined as any intentional sexual touching with any body part or object. Sexual contact is any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of the person for purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire. Assault includes but is not limited to:
Sexual exploitation is defined as taking non-consensual, unjust or abusive sexual advantage of another (i.e. prostituting another student, non-consensual video or audio-taping of sexual activity, knowingly transmitting or exposing another person to a sexually transmitted infection (STI) without the knowledge of the person)
Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other physical or verbal conduct of a sexual nature
Indecent exposure is defined as the exposure of the private or intimate parts of the body in a lewd manner, in public or in private premises, when the accused may be readily observed.
Punishment. An individual who is found to have violated any paragraph of this provision’s subsection (A) beyond a preponderance of the evidence, upon examination by the FOCC Board, shall be prescribed a punishment according to the discretion of the Board. In determination punishment, the Board may consider the circumstances surrounding the incident and are given the discretionary power to assign loss of academic privileges, academic probation, and subsequent scholarship awards as they deem appropriate, unless:
The violator has been previously convicted of violating § II or § III of this code. Conviction of a second offense under this University’s Code on Sexual Related Offenses results in automatic expulsion from the University.
CONSENT
“Consent” is defined as the voluntary act of knowingly and affirmatively verbally or non-verbally agreeing to engage in a sexual activity.
(A) Consent to one form of sexual activity does not imply consent to other or all forms of sexual activity.
(B) Prior sexual activity or relationship does not, in and of itself, constitute consent.
(C) Consent may be withdrawn at any time.
(D) An individual cannot consent when the person is:
(1) Substantially impaired by any drug or intoxicant
(2) Has been compelled by force, threat of force, coercion, or deception
(3) Unaware that the act is being committed
(4) Physically or mentally disabled
Second Oliwood Campus Code Drafting Subcommittee (SOCC)
§ 1 Gross Sexual Misconduct
(A) Any person who does any of the following, either purposely, knowingly, or recklessly has committed an act of Gross Sexual Misconduct:
(1) Any non-consensual intercourse (defined as penetration; anal or vaginal) however slight, by force or threat of imminent force, in the absence of clear, knowing, and voluntary consent,
(2) Any non-consensual oral sex, however slight, by force or threat of imminent force, in the absence of clear, knowing, and voluntary consent,
(3) Participation in non-consensual act in any substantial way. Substantial participation includes but is not limited to: (a) aiding in the misconduct by luring a victim, (b) helping to plan the assault,(c) spiking his or her drink, and (d) taking and promulgating pictures or videos of the act.
(4) Binding of the victim so that they are bound or confined without his or her consent, even if the non-consensual sexual act is not sexual intercourse or oral sex.
(5) Attempting to have non-consensual intercourse when the offender is aware that the victim has ingested any date rape drug (including but not limited to ketamine, rohypnol, rufilin), or is incapacitated to the point of inability to consent. If the victim is under the influence of alcohol and his or her physical condition is that of or near unconsciousness, consent cannot be obtained.
(B) Victim must expressly object to the sexual activity, unless he or she reasonably anticipates that her objection will result in further danger.
Punishment Procedure for Violation of § 1(A):
If a student has been accused of gross sexual misconduct, he or she will be sent written notice, and required to attend a hearing by the Student Code of Conduct Review Board.
The Board will be comprised of representatives from the Student Body, Faculty, and Administration.
The Board will consider all of the evidence and testimony from both parties.
If the Board finds beyond a reasonable doubt that gross sexual misconduct has in fact occurred, immediate expulsion of the violating party will be ordered, and the case will then be referred to the police for further investigation.
In the event that the two parties have direct conflicting testimony, and the evidence weighs in the favor of the plaintiff, the accused will face suspension for 1 year, and the case will be referred to the police for further investigation.
If it has come to the Board's attention that false accusations have been made, the accuser will be expelled.
Lesser offenses are subject to lesser penalties according to severity
November 3, 2014 in Course materials and schedule | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c8ccf53ef01b7c6ff8424970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sexual offense code reform proposals from our drafting subcommittees:
Comments
I think that these different codes all did a really great job drafting these codes. It is interesting that our class spent a lot of time debating the exact definitions of the specific acts, and the specific types of touching/body parts being used in the acts. The first drafting group didn't use intoxication as a complete negation of consent, which i think is a reflection of students wanting to forbid completely "blacked out" rape situations, but also to prevent victims from falsely crying rape after a heavy night of partying.
The second Campus Code drafting group did not want to allow for "negligent" rape mens rea, which I struggle with on both sides. On one hand, we don't want situations where people should've known the risks and acted differently, but we also don't want people being labeled as rapists when they don't have a high enough mens rea. I probably would've done what they did and not included negligent, but it I could see both sides.
Posted by: Devin Spencer | Nov 10, 2014 12:54:22 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Comments