« Some hints and help for sentencing Rob Anon under the modern federal sentencing guidelines | Main | Interesting accounting of federal bank robbery sentencing (and parole) in pre-guidelines era »
February 25, 2018
Exploring federal sentencing realities for some local federal appellants
As mentioned in class, mini-paper #3 provides you an opportunity to explore federal sentencing realities surrounding a federal defendant of your choice. Continuing a series of posts providing suggestions about possible federal defendants you might consider examining for mini-paper #3, below are some links to some Sixth Circuit opinions all from the first two months of 2018 in cases in which a federal defendant appealed some aspect of his federal sentencing.
As we will discuss in class, before modern guideline reforms, appeals of federal sentences were very rare and very rarely successful. Now, as you can see from the list below, federal sentencing appeals are quite common (and you will have to click through to get a sense for how often successful):
United States v. Terrance Ford and Brian Williams (drug offenses resulting in imprisonment for 120 months and 180 months, respectively)
United States v. Richard Thornton and Keenan Crane and David Tatum (fraud offenses resulting in imprisonment for 136 months, 80 months, and 66 months, respectively).
United States v. Bernardo Santana (drug offenses resulting in imprisonment for 180 months)
United States v. Michael Ferguson (firearm offenses resulting in imprisonment for 105 months)
United States v. Kenneth Jozwiak (fraud offenses resulting in imprisonment for 51 months)
United States v. Anthony Sanders (drug offenses resulting in imprisonment for 60 months)
United States v. John Benchick (fraud offenses resulting in imprisonment for 110 months)
United States v. Malcolm Roberson (firearm offenses resulting in imprisonment for 41 months)
United States v. Arthur Charles Smith (armed robbery offenses resulting in imprisonment for 262 month)
United States v. James Cortelyou (sex offenses resulting in imprisonment for 157 months)
United States v. Timothy Vallier (sex offenses resulting in imprisonment for 264 months)
United States v. Donald Allen (sex offenses resulting in imprisonment for 300 months)
United States v. Velasquez Curuchiche (sex offenses resulting in imprisonment for 600 months)
February 25, 2018 in Class activities, Guideline sentencing systems, Mini-papers | Permalink
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Comments