« Exploring federal sentencing realities for some local federal appellants | Main | Diving deep into many particulars of modern guideline sentencing (and mandatory minimums) for Rob Anon and others »
February 26, 2018
Interesting accounting of federal bank robbery sentencing (and parole) in pre-guidelines era
Starting with Wednesday's class, we will start unpacking the sentencing of Rob Anon under the modern federal sentencing guidelines. I welcome comments to this prior post if/when you want to discuss your experiences with guideline sentencing. This post, however, is meant to wrap up our pre-guideline sentencing experiences with the help of this interesting 1986 US Government Accounting Office report reviewing the "median sentences imposed and median time served for 609 offenders convicted of armed and unarmed bank robbery who were confined in the Federal Prison System as of June 30, 1983, and on whom release decisions had been made by the Parole Commission."
I think folks find might the whole US GAO report interesting, but I will provide this imperfect summary:
- Those convicted of armed bank robbery received a sentence of, on average, 15 years and served in prison, on average, 6 years
- Those convicted of unarmed bank robbery received a sentence of, on average, 10 years and served in prison, on average, 5 years
Usefully, the short report also notes that the US Parole Commission had "established parole release guidelines as required by law which indicate the customary range of time to be served by offenders before release from prison." These parole guidelines had two parts, "offense severity and parole prognosis": the severity of the offense was "broken down into eight categories" and the parole prognosis score ranging "from 0 to 10." These Parole Commission guidelines served as a partial template for the work of the original US Sentencing Commission creating the original US Sentencing Guidelines (especially its criminal history categories).
In addition to giving you another perspective on the range of sentencing outcomes for the likes of Rob Anon, this report serves as another reminder of just how practically consequential the abolition of parole was as a feature of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. We will discuss that reality and other parts of the SRA starting Wednesday.
February 26, 2018 in Class activities, Guideline sentencing systems, Sentencing data | Permalink
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Comments